The Art of European Claim Drafting

This seminar combines one day of claim drafting fundamentals with a further day of focused workshops.

19-20 May 2020

& 11-12 Nov 2020

GBP 1,299
EUR 1,819
USD 2,026

Book now

Course overview

This seminar combines one day of claim drafting fundamentals with a further day of focused workshops. Attendees have the choice of either a mechanical or chemical workshop.

Attendees will benefit from bringing a copy of the European Patent Convention with them.

Why you should attend

  • Enhance your understanding of the principles of the drafting process
  • Refine your drafting skills and understand the fundamentals of European claim drafting
  • Master the art of successfully preparing and defending claims according to European practice
  • Learn techniques to achieve adequate protection while meeting official requirements
  • Analyse the crucial aspects of good description, amendments and interpretation
  • Gain the edge in claims drafting through in-depth chemical or mechanical workshops

Who should attend

  • Trainee patent attorneys – preparing short or long term to qualify
  • Patent attorneys in private practice
  • Corporate patent attorneys and lawyers
  • People working or training in intellectual property

Programme day one

Led by Joeri Beetz and Leytham Wall

Know the invention

  • Know the client
  • Understand the invention
  • Novelty
  • The invention and the prior art
  • Inventive step

Claim drafting fundamentals

  • Clarity
  • Claim scope
  • Dos and don’ts

The importance of a good description

  • Structure of the description
  • Amendments and clarity
  • Sufficiency of disclosure


  • Legal background
  • In the priority year
  • After filing
  • Limitation
  • Opposition
  • Inescapable trap

Claim interpretation

  • Art. 69 EPC
  • Before and after grant
  • EP v US

International considerations

  • US
  • PCT
  • Asia
  • Drafting a global application
  • PCT applications and priority pitfalls

Programme day two CHEMICAL WORKSHOP


Led by Leythem Wall


  • Warm-up exercises
  • Chemical claim types

Further considerations for chemical drafting

  • Exclusion from patentability
  • Exceptions to patentability
  • Parameters
  • Selection inventions
  • Disclaimers
  • Inventive step v sufficiency
  • Sufficiency v clarity
  • Drafting to allow for future amendments

Claim drafting exercise

  • Invention description
  • Essential features
  • Optional features
  • Examples
  • Technical effects
  • Prior art
  • Drafting independent claims
  • Drafting dependent claims
  • Drafting the description



Led by Joeri Beetz

Preparation phase

  • Closest prior art selection
  • Novel and inventive features
  • Claim categories, technical fields

Claim sketching

  • Requirements of a patent
  • Novelty
  • Inventive step
  • Clarity
  • Essential features

Claim drafting

  • Functional claiming
  • Mere juxtaposition of features
  • One- and two-part claims
  • Scope of protection. How broad?

Dependent claims

  • Claim trees
  • Claim dependencies

Drafting the description

  • Support inventive step
  • Create fall-back positions


  • The problem-solution approach
  • Closest prior art selection
  • Claim categories
  • Novelty and inventive features


Joeri Beetz

Joeri Beetz, Patent Attorney, Keltie LLP, specialises in patents in the fields of mechanical engineering, physics and control software. Amongst all the different technologies he has been extensively involved in are optical recording, medical devices, agricultural equipment, lighting, displays and automotive. He regularly represents clients in opposition procedures at the EPO, both to defend and to attack patents. Joeri spent nine years in a Dutch patent firm based in Eindhoven, after five years of working at the in-house patent department of CNH Industrial. He joined Keltie in 2017. During his in-house period he managed a large patent portfolio for a broad range of different combine harvesters. At CNH Industrial, he built an extensive expertise in freedom to operate and patent infringement analysis and gained a keen insight in the commercial implications of different IP strategies. In 2002, Joeri obtained his masters degree in physics at the University of Utrecht. In his final year at University, he built and tested equipment for testing particle detectors for the ALICE experiment at the Large Hadron Collider at CERN.

Leythem Wall

Leythem Wall is a partner in The Hague office of European IP specialist firm HGF. He is a European and UK patent attorney with extensive experience in patent drafting, prosecution and oppositions before the European Patent Office. Having worked in private practice and industry for European and US companies, he also has significant knowledge of the US patent system, and how this compares with Europe.

Continuing professional development

This course qualifies for the following CPD programmes:

  • CPD certificate of attendance: 5.50 hours
  • General Council of the Bar: 5.50 hours

Book now

19-20 May 2020
19-20 May 2020 Rembrandt Hotel, London GBP 1,299.00
EUR 1,819.00
USD 2,026.00
+ VAT @ 20.00%
Enrol now
11-12 Nov 2020
11-12 Nov 2020 Rembrandt Hotel, London GBP 1,299.00
EUR 1,819.00
USD 2,026.00
+ VAT @ 20.00%
Enrol now

You may also be interested in

Previous customers include...

  • Autoneum Management AS
  • Bryn Aarflot AS
  • Chas. Hude
  • Chas.Hude
  • F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd
  • Helm AG
  • Høiberg
  • Leogriff
  • Mettler Toledo India (GBSI)
  • Nederlandsch Octrooibureau (NLO)
  • Nestlé
  • NLO
  • NLO - Nederlandsch Octrooibureau
  • Patentgruppen A/S
  • Patpol
  • Pharmathen SA
  • ROCKWOOL International A/S
  • Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner
  • Shelston
  • Sonn & Partner Patentanwälte
  • Ström & Gulliksson AB
  • TEVA Runcorn
  • The Navigator Company
  • Valea AB
  • VO Patents and Trademarks
  • Weiser und Voith Patentanwälte Partnerschaft
  • Yara International ASA
  • Yara SA/NV
  • Ypsomed AG

I thought it was a brilliant course, that I would recommend to others. It was really good that we were so few people, so one could ask all the "stupid" beginners questions in a closed forum.

Vibeke Bay, Patent Attorney, Høiberg

Course is really well prepared and presented. Speaker makes easy to understand everything.

Cristina Rojo Matey, Patent Attorney Trainee, NLO

The course is well organised, the speaker (Joeri) is excellent, competent, clear, patient and available to answer all our questions. The practical workshop was really useful. Overall opinion: excellent course.

Daniele Montanari, Trainee Patent Attorney, NLO - Nederlandsch Octrooibureau

Excellent course

Elen Margrethe Brendeford, Patent Attorney, Zacco Norway AS

A great content/course with competent speakers

Niels Peder Moeller, Patent Attorney, Chas. Hude A/S

Well planned, nice overview. Nice to have only two speakers.

Eline Van Kappel, Trainee Patent Attorney, VO Patents and Trademarks

Extremely well disposed and well prepared setup.

Filip Skarp, Patent Consultant, Ström & Gulliksson AB


Andreas Dietzel, IP Manager, Leogriff

I enjoyed the course and felt encouraged and valued in having decided to train as a Patent Attorney. I was given good suggestions and tips on how to approach the EQE exam and, eventually, be successful at it.

Marie Lacombe, Junior Patent Attorney, Yara International ASA


Andreas Dietzel, IP Manager, Leogriff

Kept attendees always active - perfect training

Agnieszka Zebrowska - Kucharzyk, PATPOL

Very educational

Erika Ermens, Trainee Patent Attorney, Nederlandsch Octrooibureau (NLO)

Course was well organised and the content and speakers were good

Heikki Salomaki, Salomaki

I thought it was very good. The content was good and went at a decent pace.

James Riley, Patent Engineer, TEVA Runcorn

It was very good overall, very useful in focusing the mins on the important aspects to consider when drafting a European patent application.

James Riley, Patent Engineer, TEVA Runcorn